37 C.F.R. · Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights
37 C.F.R. § 11.27

Exclusion on consent.

Title 37 C.F.R. ● ACTIVE Primary Source
Regulatory Text

37 C.F.R. § 11.27 — Exclusion on consent.

§ 11.27 Exclusion on consent. (a) Required affidavit. The OED Director may confer with a practitioner concerning possible violations by the practitioner of the Rules of Professional Conduct whether or not a disciplinary proceeding has been instituted. A practitioner who is the subject of an investigation or a pending disciplinary proceeding based on allegations of grounds for discipline, and who desires to resign, may only do so by consenting to exclusion and delivering to the OED Director an affidavit declaring the consent of the practitioner to exclusion and stating: (1) That the practitioner's consent is freely and voluntarily rendered, that the practitioner is not being subjected to coercion or duress, and that the practitioner is fully aware of the implications of consenting to exclusion; (2) That the practitioner is aware that there is currently pending an investigation into, or a proceeding involving allegations of misconduct, the nature of which shall be specifically set forth in the affidavit to the satisfaction of the OED Director; (3) That the practitioner acknowledges that, if and when he or she applies for reinstatement under § 11.60, the OED Director will conclusively presume, for the limited purpose of determining the application for reinstatement, that: (i) The facts upon which the investigation or complaint is based are true, and (ii) The practitioner could not have successfully defended himself or herself against the allegations in the investigation or charges in the complaint. (b) Action by the USPTO Director. Upon receipt of the required affidavit, the OED Director shall file the affidavit and any related papers with the USPTO Director for review and approval. The USPTO Director may order the OED Director or the practitioner to supplement the record with further information or argument. The OED Director may also file comments in response to the affidavit. If the affidavit is approved, the USPTO Director will enter an order excluding the practitioner on consent and providing other appropriate actions. Upon entry of the order, the excluded practitioner shall comply with the requirements set forth in § 11.58. (c) [Reserved] (d) Reinstatement. Any practitioner excluded on consent under this section may not petition for reinstatement for five years. A practitioner excluded on consent who intends to reapply for admission to practice before the Office must comply with the provisions of § 11.58, and apply for reinstatement in accordance with § 11.60. Failure to comply with the provisions of § 11.58 constitutes grounds for denying an application for reinstatement. [73 FR 47689, Aug. 14, 2008, as amended at 86 FR 28459, May 26, 2021]

Source: ecfr.gov · govinfo.gov — public domain Official Source ↗
Root-LD Entity Data
◈ Machine-Readable Provenance Record Root-LD v1.0 · boisestandard.org
Federation ID
BS-CFR37-SEC-EE0ED0
Entity Class
REGULATION / FEDERAL-CFR-SECTION
Domain Signature
boisestandard.org
Citation
37 C.F.R. § 11.27
Corpus
CFR — Code of Federal Regulations
Status
✓ ACTIVE
Source
PRIMARY-SOURCE
Source Verified
✓ TRUE
Content Hash
9d79b76f0ce09ed7...
Semantic Edges
Pending — corpus passes queued
The regulatory text of 37 C.F.R. § 11.27 is reproduced from the official Code of Federal Regulations as published by the Office of the Federal Register and the National Archives and Records Administration.
Navigate Corpus — Title 37 C.F.R.
◈ Provenance
boisestandard.org United States Law CFR Title 37 37 C.F.R. § 11.27